Previous:

Next:

What St. Nicholas (a.k.a. “Santa Claus”) actually looked like

Share |

by Gene Veith on December 22, 2009

in Church,History,Holidays

Forensic experts have done their number on the skull of St. Nicholas of Myra and have reconstructed what this notable 4th century Christian–who slapped Arius at the Council of Nicea and was famous for his generosity to poor children– must have actually looked like:

St. Nicholas reconstruction

The thing is, he looks pretty much the way our cultural imagination thought he would look! I mean, dress him in a red suit and put a pointy cap on his head, and you’ve got our notion of Santa Claus!

OK, he lacks the ruddy complexion, but Myra is in present-day Turkey and St. Nicholas was a Middle Easterner. As for the white beard, this is an element in ancient iconography of St. Nicholas, so it is not unlikely that he had one. He also has a broken nose. Maybe Arius hit him back!

Click the link for details about how this research was conducted. Though some of the relics held by Catholic churches are spurious, some, such as the bones of specific saints, are well-attested. I’d like to see more of this sort of thing. Seeing what these folks looked like reminds us of the historicity of the Christian faith through the ages and that the great figures of church history were human beings who were not that much different from us.

HT: Paul McCain

{ 2 trackbacks }

Grassstains.net » It Won’t Convince Andy
December 22, 2009 at 12:56 pm
More Christmas-y Links : Semicolon
December 23, 2009 at 9:26 pm

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Larry December 22, 2009 at 8:23 am

This is not directly related but related, does anyone know of any good summary relating the story of St. Nicholas of Myra as it may delve into “where santa clause comes from”?

My kids are starting to ask.

Sorry for the rabbit trail question.

Yours,

Larry

2 geneveith December 22, 2009 at 8:31 am

Good question, Larry, and an easy one: St. Nicholas by Julie Stiegmeyer, a fine author of children’s books, published by Concordia Publishing House.

3 Mary December 22, 2009 at 8:34 am

There is also a new book out by William Bennett. The True St Nicholas, Why He Is Important to Christians.

4 Larry December 22, 2009 at 9:05 am

Dr. Veith and Mary,

Thank you very much!

Larry

5 Lars Walker December 22, 2009 at 10:09 am

I love this stuff. I suppose this puts me in the position of supporting grave-robbing, but I’d be excited to see a massive project to reconstruct the faces of historical personages. Computer technology has simplified the process immensely.

6 Dr. Luther in 21st Century December 22, 2009 at 11:15 am

I wonder how much of the forensic reconstruction was influenced by the early iconography.

7 M Burke December 22, 2009 at 1:52 pm

He even has a twinkle in his eye!

8 Bike Bubba December 22, 2009 at 6:41 pm

Looks a little lean, kinda like in that “Rudolph” version before Mrs. Claus fattens him up. :^)

9 Jonathan December 22, 2009 at 7:36 pm

Wonder if they will do the same for Saint Paul?!

10 geneveith December 22, 2009 at 11:02 pm

Some Catholic churches claim to have the relics of various of the Apostles. St. Peter’s bones are supposedly buried in the Vatican. I suspect St. Paul’s are venerated somewhere in Rome. Let’s check them out and do some facial constructions!

11 Lars Walker December 22, 2009 at 11:50 pm

I understand they think they have Paul’s bones. But he was beheaded. Is the skull even included?

12 Derek Kurth December 23, 2009 at 2:19 pm

A recent Issues, Etc. program about St. Nicholas mentioned that while he probably slapped someone at the council of Nicea, it could not have been Arius, because Arius was not invited to the council, being “just a priest.” It may have been Eusebius of Nicomedia (who, according to Wikipedia, baptised Constantine and was a supporter of Arius).

The guest on that Issues, Etc. program was Pastor Heath Curtis of Trinity Lutheran in Worden, IL and Zion Lutheran in Carpenter, IL. I’d always thought Nicholas slapped Arius himself, too, so this was news to me!

13 Fr Christopher Kelley December 27, 2009 at 10:59 pm

St Athanasius was a DEACON, but attended the First Council of Nicaea. The idea that priests COULD NOT attend is erroneous. Many bishops had assistants, entourages. And while the Pope of Alexandria would NOT have brought Arius, a priest of his own diocese, Arius did have a supporter in Eusebius of Nicomedia, as stated.
The question might rather be: Did Arius have official “seat & voice”? No. Not unless it were granted to him by the bishops of the Council.
Arius was a man who liked to be “out & about”, liked to “hobnob” & “schmooze.” The Council would have been a magnet to him! He’d invested a lot of energy in popularizing his error; he was not going to let it go down without a fight.

14 James Rosenthal January 2, 2010 at 6:22 am

This is very important as St Nicholas leads us to Christmas as Santa leads to himself. St Nicholas is important as a Middle East saint as well esp in Beit Jala Palestine. Try ST NICHOLAS A CLOSER LOOK AT CHRISTMAS as well.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous:

Next: