<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama vs. Dobson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/</link>
	<description>Christianity, Culture, Vocation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:31:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eiq4822rwq07yuq51qq</title>
		<link>http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-23659</link>
		<dc:creator>eiq4822rwq07yuq51qq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-23659</guid>
		<description>http://gogle.com google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gogle.com" rel="nofollow">http://gogle.com</a> google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: afymhqcnl hzdgcxq</title>
		<link>http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-19362</link>
		<dc:creator>afymhqcnl hzdgcxq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-19362</guid>
		<description>peirgh ylbtgp axgbnw wvfan brmvuo zfjkla lnfbsromt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>peirgh ylbtgp axgbnw wvfan brmvuo zfjkla lnfbsromt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8809</link>
		<dc:creator>William Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8809</guid>
		<description>Francis Beckwith comments here:

http://www.whatswrongwiththeworld.net/2008/06/barack_obama_religious_citizen.html

Concerning the role of religion in our legislation and government:

&quot;It is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles 
upon which freedom can securely stand.&quot; 

— President John Quincy Adams, 1776

&quot;A trained intelligence can do much, but there is no substitute for morality, 
character and religious conviction &quot;–Pres. Calvin Coolidge, 1924 


&quot;The belief in a God All Powerful wise and good, is so essential to the moral order of the world and to the happiness of man, that arguments which enforce it cannot be drawn from too many sources nor adapted with too much solicitude to the different characters and capacities impressed with it.&quot; ---James Madison

Lastly from George Washington&#039;s  farewell speech:

&quot;Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. ... Let it simply be asked: Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice ? And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Francis Beckwith comments here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whatswrongwiththeworld.net/2008/06/barack_obama_religious_citizen.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.whatswrongwiththeworld.net/2008/06/barack_obama_religious_citizen.html</a></p>
<p>Concerning the role of religion in our legislation and government:</p>
<p>&#8220;It is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles<br />
upon which freedom can securely stand.&#8221; </p>
<p>— President John Quincy Adams, 1776</p>
<p>&#8220;A trained intelligence can do much, but there is no substitute for morality,<br />
character and religious conviction &#8220;–Pres. Calvin Coolidge, 1924 </p>
<p>&#8220;The belief in a God All Powerful wise and good, is so essential to the moral order of the world and to the happiness of man, that arguments which enforce it cannot be drawn from too many sources nor adapted with too much solicitude to the different characters and capacities impressed with it.&#8221; &#8212;James Madison</p>
<p>Lastly from George Washington&#8217;s  farewell speech:</p>
<p>&#8220;Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. &#8230; Let it simply be asked: Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice ? And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8782</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8782</guid>
		<description>Jim Wallis&#039; response is below. The speech took place at  Sojouners event: 
http://blog.beliefnet.com/godspolitics/2008/06/dobson-and-obama-who-is-delibe.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Wallis&#8217; response is below. The speech took place at  Sojouners event:<br />
<a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/godspolitics/2008/06/dobson-and-obama-who-is-delibe.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.beliefnet.com/godspolitics/2008/06/dobson-and-obama-who-is-delibe.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acceptable Biblical Illiteracy &#171; Off The Wire</title>
		<link>http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8743</link>
		<dc:creator>Acceptable Biblical Illiteracy &#171; Off The Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8743</guid>
		<description>[...] 24, 2008 by Matthew Wireman    Gene Veith posts some thoughts on Obama&#8217;s lack of biblical clarity and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 24, 2008 by Matthew Wireman    Gene Veith posts some thoughts on Obama&#8217;s lack of biblical clarity and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fw</title>
		<link>http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8742</link>
		<dc:creator>fw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8742</guid>
		<description>#13  Joe

as always your posts provoke thought dear brother...  i THINK obama is saying that all legislation needs to be based on the best of secular logic, as in aristotle&#039;s moralism or the stoics...

that reason and reasoned debate need to be the common basis for our society, and that religious arguments have no place in the governmental sphere.

I am thinking that if this is not so, our form of american government is unworkable.

as for your example of anwar, I think this misses the mark and manifests a misunderstanding on your part of obama&#039;s views (and my own actually).  Obama is in the strong tradition of the liberal deists who founded our country and those who pushed for a separation of church and state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#13  Joe</p>
<p>as always your posts provoke thought dear brother&#8230;  i THINK obama is saying that all legislation needs to be based on the best of secular logic, as in aristotle&#8217;s moralism or the stoics&#8230;</p>
<p>that reason and reasoned debate need to be the common basis for our society, and that religious arguments have no place in the governmental sphere.</p>
<p>I am thinking that if this is not so, our form of american government is unworkable.</p>
<p>as for your example of anwar, I think this misses the mark and manifests a misunderstanding on your part of obama&#8217;s views (and my own actually).  Obama is in the strong tradition of the liberal deists who founded our country and those who pushed for a separation of church and state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8739</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8739</guid>
		<description>Obama’s position that you can’t vote for legislation based on your beliefs unless other’s beliefs would also reach the same result is just simply unworkable.  And, is it limited to religion?  Obama does not support drilling in ANWAR – but my beliefs say we should, so how can he possible oppose it.  According to his own standard, doesn’t he have to accommodate my views?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama’s position that you can’t vote for legislation based on your beliefs unless other’s beliefs would also reach the same result is just simply unworkable.  And, is it limited to religion?  Obama does not support drilling in ANWAR – but my beliefs say we should, so how can he possible oppose it.  According to his own standard, doesn’t he have to accommodate my views?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Lindemood</title>
		<link>http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8732</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Lindemood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8732</guid>
		<description>Its so nice for politicians to have the luxury of practical athiesm.  You pull your little god out of your pocket when you need to appeal to the masses and then you put the little guy away when you need to get something done.  Isn&#039;t Obama&#039;s god convenient for him, never getting in the way of his politics.  (By the way, doesn&#039;t McCain do this too?)  And don&#039;t you really have to somehow state to the people that you are a practical athiest just like them if you are to be elected these days.  I mean, you can believe in Jesus and all that, but for goodness sake, leave it at church, man!

P.S. Maybe Dobson should find a good seminary to attend - He could be a second-career guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its so nice for politicians to have the luxury of practical athiesm.  You pull your little god out of your pocket when you need to appeal to the masses and then you put the little guy away when you need to get something done.  Isn&#8217;t Obama&#8217;s god convenient for him, never getting in the way of his politics.  (By the way, doesn&#8217;t McCain do this too?)  And don&#8217;t you really have to somehow state to the people that you are a practical athiest just like them if you are to be elected these days.  I mean, you can believe in Jesus and all that, but for goodness sake, leave it at church, man!</p>
<p>P.S. Maybe Dobson should find a good seminary to attend &#8211; He could be a second-career guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: utahrainbow</title>
		<link>http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8728</link>
		<dc:creator>utahrainbow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8728</guid>
		<description>A little off topic, 
but why, Brian, don&#039;t stay-at-home moms need good theology?  Why do WE get the &quot;embarrassing&quot; ones?  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little off topic,<br />
but why, Brian, don&#8217;t stay-at-home moms need good theology?  Why do WE get the &#8220;embarrassing&#8221; ones?  <img src='http://www.geneveith.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8721</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneveith.com/obama-vs-dobson/_690/#comment-8721</guid>
		<description>Ted, are you kidding? Of course I am adding to the discussion. I&#039;m simply suggesting that Dobson should stick with family psychology. 

Personally, I find Dobson and other fundamentalists like himself to be a bit embarrassing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted, are you kidding? Of course I am adding to the discussion. I&#8217;m simply suggesting that Dobson should stick with family psychology. </p>
<p>Personally, I find Dobson and other fundamentalists like himself to be a bit embarrassing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
